Skip to main content

Sally Morgan



Genuine or hot/cold reader (and selective editing)? You can probably guess what I think. Derren Brown recently said in passing it's a shame we cannot imprison psychic fakes and charlatans like in the old days. Let's bring those days back, I say. The "Luke" example at 3min 30 secs looks to me like a really excellent bit of cold reading. Worth replaying to see exactly what she does...

Here's some hot reading...



Thanks to Skeptic's Dictionary - which provides excellent resources on hot and cold reading.

Comments

Hannah Nichol said…
I love James Randi, the way he examines and explains things so simply and carefully in his videos!

Also, that Popoff guy seemed quite terrifying--I think if I met him in the flesh I would run and hide from him, though I suppose it must help to hype up the audience!

I felt very sorry for the lady who suffered arthritis; there must have been so much pressure on her to do that walk, and she clearly was having some trouble!

It's a good job that honest peoples like Derren Brown and James Randi are out there!!!

Stephen, have you ever seen the Derren Brown clip with the voodoo doll and the spiritualist? I can't seem to find the video on the internet (probably because of copyright), but he takes a ring from the woman, and puts it in a voodoo doll. He then proceeds to do things to the voodoo doll (I'm not sure that she can even actually see what he is doing), but he succeeds in making her unable to talk or move in any way. He then reveals that he never actually took the ring in the first place--it was just slight of hand and it is still on her finger! It's only short, but a really good example of how easily people can be drawn into beliefs and the power that these then have over them.
Stephen Law said…
Yes the voodoo thing was freaky.
pascal said…
'Derren Brown recently said in passing it's a shame we cannot imprison psychic fakes and charlatans like in the old days. Let's bring those days back, I say.'

Well, in the really old days the Scythians burned alive failed soothsayers (Herodotus via Montaigne), but you and Derren Brown appear to be unfamiliar with the extraordinary magical powers of google.

If you had essayed them you would have discovered the Consumer Protection Regulations, introduced in 2008, where errant psychics, along with double glazing salespeople, can face fines of up to £5,000, if their case is heard in a magistrates’ courts, or a fine and up to two years in jail if the case is severe enough to be heard in the Crown Court.

As Frances Gibb said in the Times, the fortune tellers must have have seen it coming; you and Derren should at least have realised it had arrived...

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

Why I won't be voting Labour at the next General Election, not even to 'keep the Tories out'.

I have always voted Labour, and have often been a member of the Party, campaigning and canvassing for them. For what it’s worth, here’s my feeling about voting Labour next General Election:   1. When the left vote Labour after they move rightwards, they are encouraged to just move further right, to the point where they are now probably right of where e.g. John Major’s Tory party was. And each time the Tories go further right still. At some point we have got to stop fuelling this toxic drift to the right by making the Labour Party realise that it’s going to start costing them votes. I can’t think of anything politically more important than halting this increasingly frightening rightward slide. So I am no longer voting Labour. 2. If a new socialist party starts up, it could easily hoover up many of the 200k former LP members who have left in disgust (I’d join), and perhaps also pick up union affiliations. They could become the second biggest party by membership quite quickly. Our voting

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist