Skip to main content

Resonance FM radio show

I will be on London's Resonance FM "Little Atoms" radio show 7pm tomorrow (Friday) night. Talking about CFI, scepticism, religion, etc.

Comments

Mr. Hamtastic said…
Anyway to get that in the US?
Anonymous said…
Off topic but you have come across the comedian Tim Michin ?

His stage poem (!!!) is an excellant rant against new age woo woo. It's worth a look for a chuckle if nothing else.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UB_htqDCP-s&feature=related
dobson said…
Mr. Hamtastic: Yes

Little Atoms is one of the shows included in the Resonance FM podcast feed.

While you subscribe, I think all your readers would enjoy Hooting Yard which is another show podcasted by Resonance FM.

Sal
Stephen Law said…
Just did the radio prog. My 3 year old appeared halfway through and started climbing over my head before starting up a noisy DIY project in the corner. Hopefully it didn't show.
Crispian Jago said…
Little Atoms is also available on iTunes and has a fine selections of guest speakers in addition to Stephen. Here's a recent review of my favourite science, reason and critical thinking podcasts.

http://crispian-jago.blogspot.com/2009/03/top-of-pods.html
Matt M said…
Is anyone else having trouble with Little Atoms iTunes feed? I've subscribed, but it keeps telling me that the feed can't be found on the server.
Crispian Jago said…
The iTunes feed was down for a couple of days but it was up again last time I checked. Looks like Neil has updated the feedburner name. You can access it directly from the link below, if you’re still having problems with iTunes:

http://feeds2.feedburner.com/littleatomspodcast
Matt M said…
Thanks for that, Crispian. I used the link you provided and it worked like a treat.

Popular posts from this blog

EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS

(Published in Faith and Philosophy 2011. Volume 28, Issue 2, April 2011. Stephen Law. Pages 129-151) EVIDENCE, MIRACLES AND THE EXISTENCE OF JESUS Stephen Law Abstract The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existence beyond reasonable doubt. Many believe the New Testament documents alone suffice firmly to establish Jesus as an actual, historical figure. I question these views. In particular, I argue (i) that the three most popular criteria by which various non-miraculous New Testament claims made about Jesus are supposedly corroborated are not sufficient, either singly or jointly, to place his existence beyond reasonable doubt, and (ii) that a prima facie plausible principle concerning how evidence should be assessed – a principle I call the contamination principle – entails that, given the large proportion of uncorroborated miracle claims made about Jesus in the New Testament documents, we should, in the absence of indepen

Why I won't be voting Labour at the next General Election, not even to 'keep the Tories out'.

I have always voted Labour, and have often been a member of the Party, campaigning and canvassing for them. For what it’s worth, here’s my feeling about voting Labour next General Election:   1. When the left vote Labour after they move rightwards, they are encouraged to just move further right, to the point where they are now probably right of where e.g. John Major’s Tory party was. And each time the Tories go further right still. At some point we have got to stop fuelling this toxic drift to the right by making the Labour Party realise that it’s going to start costing them votes. I can’t think of anything politically more important than halting this increasingly frightening rightward slide. So I am no longer voting Labour. 2. If a new socialist party starts up, it could easily hoover up many of the 200k former LP members who have left in disgust (I’d join), and perhaps also pick up union affiliations. They could become the second biggest party by membership quite quickly. Our voting

Aquinas on homosexuality

Thought I would try a bit of a draft out on the blog, for feedback. All comments gratefully received. No doubt I've got at least some details wrong re the Catholic Church's position... AQUINAS AND SEXUAL ETHICS Aquinas’s thinking remains hugely influential within the Catholic Church. In particular, his ideas concerning sexual ethics still heavily shape Church teaching. It is on these ideas that we focus here. In particular, I will look at Aquinas’s justification for morally condemning homosexual acts. When homosexuality is judged to be morally wrong, the justification offered is often that homosexuality is, in some sense, “unnatural”. Aquinas develops a sophisticated version of this sort of argument. The roots of the argument lie in thinking of Aristotle, whom Aquinas believes to be scientifically authoritative. Indeed, one of Aquinas’s over-arching aims was to show how Aristotle’s philosophical system is broadly compatible with Christian thought. I begin with a sketch of Arist